Press "Enter" to skip to content

Op-Ed: Texas Legislature and the Erosion of Local Decision-Making – Part 1

Share this story

Rockwall Voices Op-Ed

Over the past several legislative sessions, the Texas Legislature has steadily chipped away at the ability of cities and counties to govern themselves. As we head into the 89th session, one of the most pressing issues remains the continued preemption of local decision-making—an intentional shift of power from local governments to Austin.

This is not a new trend. Since the 86th legislative session, state lawmakers have increasingly overridden local authority on critical matters, from business regulations and building material standards to municipal utility district (MUD) expansions and extraterritorial jurisdiction (ETJ) deannexations. The preemption even extends to local agricultural codes and the removal of qualified immunity for local election officials—while conveniently maintaining legal protections for state officials.

Support the Businesses That Support Our Community

The state legislature has long been wary of “local control” because it implies that cities and counties have absolute authority over businesses and private property owners. So, the terminology has evolved. First, “local control” became “local decision-making.” Now, we hear the phrase “local managing.” The shift in language is telling. “Local government management” suggests that municipalities are not meant to govern but merely to implement decisions made by the state. It is a deliberate redefinition that undermines the very foundation of representative local government.

This is not about partisan politics—it’s about principle. Texas was built on the belief that government works best when it is closest to the people. Cities and counties are on the front lines of governance, responding directly to residents’ needs. Yet, with each passing session, state lawmakers strip away more local authority, consolidating power in Austin and leaving local leaders with fewer tools to address the unique challenges of their communities.

So, you don’t believe me? Let’s look at the evidence for the 89th session.

Senate Bill 673, authored by Senator Hughes (R), which may authorize Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs) by right—except in developments governed by HOAs. Then there’s House Bill 1835, introduced by Representative Guillen (R), which may limit the ability of local governments to regulate new HUD-code manufactured homes.

Additionally, Lt. Governor Dan Patrick has announced Senate Bill 15 – Removing Barriers to Affordable Housing. This bill is expected to be an omnibus measure, likely to include various land use and zoning preemptions. The anticipated author of the bill is State Senator Paul Bettencourt, who also serves as Chairman of the State Senate Committee on Local Government.

The 89th Legislature presents an opportunity to correct this course. If state leaders truly believe in limited government, they must restore the ability of local officials to make decisions that reflect the will of their communities. Otherwise, we risk a future where “local government” exists in name only—nothing more than an administrative arm of the state.

The time to defend local decision-making is now. Rockwall County and its cities must push back against the state’s encroachment and demand the ability to govern in the best interest of their residents. The alternative is a centralized, one-size-fits-all approach that erodes the very freedoms Texas prides itself on.

Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in this Op-Ed are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official stance of The Rockwall Times. We encourage a respectful exchange of perspectives to enrich our community dialogue.


Share this story
Support the Businesses That Support Our Community
Support the Businesses That Support Our Community
Mission News Theme by Compete Themes.